Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.

Productivity hacks for handfuls of new business card contacts

business_cards.jpgWhen I go out to a networking event or conference, I put a stack of business cards in my pocket and go hard until they're gone. Business cards, like email, remain an essential networking and organizing tool, but they are also really messy in this digital world and can end up in stacks on your desk or kitchen counter. 

I wanted to make the most out of business card contacts so went on a hunt for productivity tools. There are lots of options out there, but what I landed on is leaps and bounds ahead of other options.

  1. Download the FullContact Business Card Reader App for iOS or Android.

  2. Set up a FullContact account.

  3. Create a new spreadsheet in your primary Google Apps account and add the following column headers (these are a bit flexible (and designed for my imports into NationBuilder's community organizing system) but you'll want most of them: First name; middle name; last name; company; title; website; work email; address city; address zip; address state; address1; address country; work phone; mobile phone; Home phone; Other phone; fax; tags (this is how I use FullContact's note); Twitter URL; Facebook URL; About Me URL; External ID

  4. Create an account with Zapier.com and use this template to great a zap that will sync your FullContact cards with your spreadsheet: http://zpr.io/Rb3Q

 

After you've finished the setup (about 30 minutes that will save you hours and hours of data entry later), you can snap a picture of any cards you pick up, they will be transcribed into FullContact, and automatically synched to your spreadsheet. You can then download a csv of that spreadsheet and import it into any contact management system of your choice.

Add your reaction Share

Always on the side of the egg

"Between a high, solid wall and an egg that breaks against it, I will always stand on the side of the egg.

"Yes, no matter how right the wall may be and how wrong the egg, I will stand with the egg. ...

"Each of us is, more or less, an egg. Each of us is a unique, irreplaceable soul enclosed in a fragile shell. This is true of me, and it is true of each of you. And each of us, to a greater or lesser degree, is confronting a high, solid wall. The wall has a name: It is The System. ...

"We are all human beings, individuals transcending nationality and race and religion, fragile eggs faced with a solid wall called The System. To all appearances, we have no hope of winning. The wall is too high, too strong - and too cold. If we have any hope of victory at all, it will have to come from our believing in the utter uniqueness and irreplaceability of our own and others' souls and from the warmth we gain by joining souls together."

~ Haruki Murakami

Add your reaction Share

Bursting out of the dating time capsule

I'm single after 17 years. It's going to be OK. So let's get on with it.

I was married before I could legally go into a bar. And the internet's been good to me (I did have a friend in my early 20s who met his wife online, back when that was weird).

So I've got an OkCupid, a Match.com, and a Tinder. I don't exactly know what I want out of romantic life next, but I know I'm interested in dating and I need to meet people I don't work with or who aren't from my kids' swim club. It's been a few weeks in the online dating pool and I've learned that it's hell. Female friends advise me on photos where my intense eyes and bald head don't create a serial killer vibe. Male friends talk about the pure numbers game that's meeting someone in a bar or on OkCupid.

Read more
Add your reaction Share

How I lost 72 lbs. in less than a year

People ask me how I lost so much weight, so fast. The first 20 lbs. weren't really noticeable. That's what I call my "startup weight," the mass I put on quickly when I transitioned three years ago from a commuter job that had me walking at least a mile a day to living seven days a week out of my home office. 

The next 50 lbs. were more impressive. "It's like a whole piece of you is gone!" remarked a coworker recently. 72 lbs. is my seven year old son and one of our cats. It's a hell of a lot of weight.

Skinny people ask me how I did it, which always seems weird, because I've still got a ways to go to really be where I want to be. But I'm in the best shape I've been - better in a lot of ways - since I was 21. I hit my 2014 goal here in May. The weight has just started to pour off - 25 lbs. in just the last eight weeks. And there's been a healthy pattern to it that's not been all that hard. 

Read more
Add your reaction Share

I bought bitcoin

It involved bank account, credit card and identification verification, an app called "Authy," and a surprisingly high transaction fee (about 1% - and the exchange rate for these things is all over the place), but in less than 15 minutes of effort, I bought my first bitcoin using Coinbase.

viva la revolucion

(Oh, and if you use my referral link in the image above to join this with me, we both get $5 of satoshis.)

1 reaction Share

Gov 2.0 Where Are They Now? A Five-Year Retrospective

Maybe it's end-of-year nostalgia, or maybe it's all the LinkedIn feed employment updates plus awareness of changes at my own company, anyway, I got to thinking this week about my initial explorations into the community of government transparency and digital reform known as "Gov 2.0" or "open government."

I got involved in Gov 2.0 in 2008 as a municipal government employee after wondering whether some of the digital engagement strategies of the Barack Obama presidential campaign could be applied to civic engagement in a more formal context, and found a small but welcoming community first on LinkedIn, then on GovLoop.com and Twitter. I went on to become group manager for the LinkedIn Government 2.0 community, to start the Gov 2.0 Radio podcast, and to make a (highly unsuccessful) run for U.S. Congress. During that campaign, I met Jim Gilliam, a civic technology entrepreneur, and, in 2011, I joined Jim and his co-founder Jesse Haff at NationBuilder.

NationBuilder, a community organizing system, now has 80 employees and provides a web platform for thousands of politicians and elected officials, and a growing number of cities and agencies. I recently met a new intern on our data team who has quite a local (NationBuilder is based in downtown Los Angeles) reputation in the open government community, and when she added me to a couple of her community Twitter lists, it struck me that I know fewer of the names and faces of today's Gov 2.0.

***

For a more up-to-date view of the Gov 2.0 community, check out these Twitter lists:

https://twitter.com/digiphile/gov20/members

https://twitter.com/govloop/govloop-rockstars/members

https://twitter.com/adrielhampton/global-gov2/members

***

Read more
6 reactions Share

Healthcare.gov: a failure for open gov buzzwords

There's been a big shift in how people use the web that caught up with Healthcare.gov and sister sites yesterday. You can build the most beautiful and "scalable" website for web visits, make it open source, put the code up on GitHub, talk about how innovative it is, then watch it crumble under the server strain of people trying to actually do something through your site.

Healthcare.gov's real challenge wasn't to build an alternative to a commercial CMS (content management system), it was to build an application that can handle event-oriented human behavior - for that you need the best systems engineering, not "10,000 authenticated users through GitHub" for your content delivery, as one of the Healthcare.gov contractors highlighted in this Atlantic profile of the project by Alex Howard.

Before the application process bogged down yesterday, Healthcare.gov got lots of nice gov tech insider buzz for its open source nature. But the project still had contractors on board, and based on how the service behaved on opening day of the Affordable Care Act, it could have stood a lot more testing of what people actually wanted to do with it. Kind of like Mitt Romney's Orca system on election day last November.

The Healthcare.gov site loaded fine, but trying to apply through it was kinda like buying first-time Comic-Con badges online.

Open source has changed the technology landscape for the better, underpinning many of our favorite startups. However, simply invoking it like a protection spell is no replacement for the architectural skill and planning required to pull off the systems needed for a successful Healthcare.gov launch. Health and Human Services, which managed the project, needed a little more "Puppet vs. Salt" and a little less "open" in its vernacular. 

Adapting to a web where people are participants, not viewers, is the lesson we're all learning. Web infrastructure needs to support people, not publishing.

The reaction to failures of Healthcare.gov under heavy load won't work if the discussion is about how other services fail - it has to be about building infrastructure that's designed for peak interactivity and not for views.

Choice quotes from the Atlantic profile:

Bryan Sivak, CTO at Health and Human Services: "Instead of [running] farms of application servers to handle massive load, you're basically slimming down to two. ... The way it's being built matters."

Dave Cole from HSS contractor Development Seed: "You're just talking about content. There just needs to be one server. We're going to have two, with one for backup. That's a deduction of 30 servers."

Maybe there was a lot more infrastructure work going on behind the scenes, but the project leads' obsessive focus on the content framework is telling. 

Healthcare.gov's scaling challenge was never about delivering content like a really popular website, it was the peak activity challenge that Twitter faces on a regular basis. Taking interaction-based scaling challenges seriously is why Twitter is stable now and wasn't in 2009 - those are the issues HHS should have been talking about.

___

Few updates after a bit of Twitter fun on these issues today:

Not faulting Alex's reporting in any way here - I believe if the HHS team was really focused on the infrastructure for supporting a signup rush at the time of the Atlantic article, that dedication would have shown up in the story. The omission of that kind of discussion (read the article - the project team seems to have an almost flippant approach to back-end server architecture). I also googled around looking for commentary on that front from earlier in the life of the project.

I didn't do a detailed investigation, this is an opinion blog piece not investigative journalism. As I said above, it's quite possible there was more going on - but the fact the site had so much persistent trouble as an actual application (while it functioned fine as what we call in the biz a "brochure site") means whatever was done fell dangerously short. 

Second, Matthew Hancock points out that the signup form on launch was loading 92 separate resources, including 56 separate javascript files. Whether you're using a CDN or not, that's just bad. "The site basically DDOSed itself," in Hancock's opinion.

Finally, if an important initiative like Healthcare.gov is going to get 2.8 million views in a day, I want everyone who wants to apply through that site to do so smoothly. My ding on "open government buzzwords" is that it's really easy to do "innovative" things with government technology and get headlines, without actually delivering for constituents.

___

Another update from Twitter conversation:

Alex speculates the devs and designers who built the content framework aren't to blame here.

Fair enough. I think it's fairly clear from the above that I blamed HSS and a culture of thinking that web properties are publishing applications and not designing them for interaction. It's really time to stop talking about a "front-end" and a "back-end" for any kind of website. If it doesn't scale for interaction, it doesn't scale. Twitter's infrastructure challenge isn't displaying millions of tweets, it's keeping all of them threaded in real-time. 

Open source content frameworks are nice (hey, Twitter released Bootstrap!), but HHS separated that issue from the kind of services needed to effectively scale the application process. It's like building a really shiny muscle car and then giving it a weak 2-liter engine. Fully integrated applications with content delivery and scalable interaction design are really, really hard. And that's where buzzwords fall short.

___

Sept. 7 update:

On Saturday, I wrote about these issues on GovFresh, "The openwashing of Healthcare.gov" and cited a Reuters article that laid the project on CGI Inc., a giant federal contractor. 

Today, the Wall Street Journal quoted an HHS spokeswoman and IT experts regarding flaws in the system. The article mentions CGI and also says Experian had a contract around identity verification. Based on the analyses I've read, it seems like there could be timeouts or critical delays between security question submittal and verification, which would indicate architecture issues again, not an Experian issue per se. 

6 reactions Share

Rules to Govern Your Nation

1 reaction Share

Blogging about NationBuilder Live

This is before the flip.

Read more
Add your reaction Share

Huffington Post Live: Should Congress Go Virtual?

HuffPoLive.png

On a recent segment of HuffPost Live, NationBuilder VP of Community Adriel Hampton participated in a virtual roundtable discussion on Rep. Steve Pearce's (R-N.M.) proposed legislation to create a "virtual Congress." Rep. Pearce believes that allowing members of Congress to spend the majority of their time in their home districts will enable them to be more connected to the needs of the people they are representing.

Read more
1 reaction Share