• Suggestions
  • Upcoming Events
  • Blog
    • Blog
    • Join
    • Adriel's Bio
    • Tumblr Updates
    • OTBR
    • CA-10 (archive)
    • CA-10 Press (archive)
  • LinkedIn Gov 2.0
  • Open Data Community
    • Open Data Community
    • Last chance for open data formats legislation
    • Briefing Doc
    • Open Data Recruiting Tools
  • Gov 2.0 Radio
  • NationBuilder Instagram

Adriel Nation

Pages tagged "opendata"


Briefing Doc

Posted on Open Data Community by Adriel Hampton · November 18, 2011 9:37 PM · 12 reactions

This is the briefing document I've provided for prospective lead legislative sponsors (see questions and comments below):

Along with a number of other open government advocates, I've launched a campaign to put a definition of "open data online" into California and San Francisco law. The issue is that often when documents and data are published online, they cannot be accessed or used in a meaningful fashion because they cannot be searched, indexed by Google, or combined in a meaningful way with other documents for analysis. I want to tackle this not by mandating that certain documents and data be published online, but simply by creating a reference standard so that when new mandates pass, or new documents are published online as a matter of course under existing law or regular business, they are in accessible formats.

This has the benefits of making things easier for people who use screen readers, for developer who want to use public data to build applications, for transparency advocates, and is simply good policy. Publishing data in formats that can't be searched, compared to other documents or reused in a meaningful way is as useless as keeping it tucked away in an obscured file cabinets. Publishing in accessible formats online is as simply as education employees in how to properly save and store documents for online publication using the same software they already have on their computers. In an ironic demonstration of the current problem, San Francisco's current open data law was published by the Board of Supervisors as an unsearchable PDF.

Proposal: San Francisco/California Open Data Standard

Draft Text: Heretoforth, any documents or data published online by the State of California/City and County of San Francisco and its employees, departments and agencies must be published in a structured format that can be retrieved, downloaded, indexed, sorted, searched, and reused by commonly used Web search applications and commonly used software.
Background: California/San Francisco would further cement its leadership position as one of the global leaders in open government and accessibility by adopting this standard. It is derived from model open government legislation proposed by the global CityCamp movement (http://opengovernmentinitiative.org/directive/v1/). Much of the existing open data legislation from around the world lacks simple and clear standards definitions such as this (http://wiki.civiccommons.org/Open_Data_Policy). Creating this standard would be the foundation for ensuring that future laws around publication of State/CCSF documents are meaningful. See also background on open data standards around the world:http://wiki.civiccommons.org/Open_Standards_Policy. 
Associated costs: None, and possibility of savings. This standards legislation would not create a new mandate for publication, rather it would give clear guidance on how data is to be published - using commonly accessible formats without requiring a specific format that could be outdated by technological developments. Passage of this law would reduce the burden of reformatting documents to comply with records requests as documents published under this standard would be easily accessible. It also has the benefit of opening government data to innovators from around the world to build useful applications using public data.
Early support: Since we publicly launched a campaign to enshrine this standard into law in SF and California on Nov. 16, 2011, we have seen significant support across social media channels, and endorsements from open government leaders from San Francisco, California and around the world, including:
  • Javier Muniz, CTO and co-founder, Granicus (based in SoMa and one of the greatest open gov tech company success stories in the U.S.)
  • Steve Ressler, founder, GovLoop
  • Rep. Jason Murphey, Chairman of the House Goverment Modernization Committee, Oklahoma
  • Scott Primeau, OpenColorado
  • Luke Frewell, founder and publisher, GovFresh
  • and many more who can be viewed  online - http://www.wiredtoshare.com/structured_open_data_campaign
The legislative proposal is also supported by CityCampSF, Gov 2.0 Radio, GovFresh and the SF Tech Dems.

Structured Open Data Campaign - Sign On!

Posted by Adriel Hampton · November 16, 2011 4:39 PM · 197 reactions
Update May 31, 2012:

This bill, SB 1002, passsed 34-0 out of the California Senate today! Here is the statement from Sen. Leland Yee, the bill's author.
"The Senate Appropriations committee today recognized the need for government agencies to deliver information to the public in an efficient, modern format," said Jim Ewert, General Counsel for the California Newspaper Publishers Association. "SB 1002 will set the benchmark for transparency and government oversight in the 21st century."
Here's a link to updates on the bill, including recent amendments.

UPDATE Feb. 7, 2012:

Sen. Yee's office is working on SB 1002 and the language is still in draft. Open government and open data advocates are encouraged to comment, and I am helping organizing a meeting with the Senator for the week of Feb. 20 in San Francisco.

Here's the FAQ on SB 1002 (pdf)

And here's the draft bill text for SB 1002 (pdf)


Comments meant for official consideration should be directed to Alicia Lewis, alicia.lewis [at] sen.ca.gov

_________________________________________

Open data in San Francisco, the state of California, and throughout much of the U.S. and the world remains hobbled by a lack of legal definition. San Francisco's own open data law, for example, is posted online by the Board of Supervisors as a non-searchable PDF. On December 10-11, at the winter CityCampSF Hackathon, Gov 2.0 advocates will publicly launch an advocacy campaign to institute an open data standard in San Francisco municipal and California state law. The primary goal of this advocacy will be to achieve a clear and reasonable definition of open data for all materials required by law to be published online.

Please join us in endorsing this advocacy campaign, and encourage your friends and legislators to sign on as well.

Use our recruiting tools to rally your friends to this important cause.

For more backgound on open data laws, check out Civic Commons - Data Policy Policy; and Open Standards Policy.

For another definition of open data online that we will consider, see the CityCamp model Open Government directive, which describes open data as being published online in an "open format that can be retrieved, downloaded, indexed, sorted, searched, and reused by commonly used Web search applications and commonly used software."

This legislation should also encompass the goals of increased transparency in responses to SF Sunshine Ordinance requests and California Public Records Act requests - documents released in an electronic format after implementation of this ordinance would have to follow its standards of accessibility.

Machine-readability: Data should be published in structured formats easily processed by machines/software.

Endorse

Radical Open Source Law Project Swings Through San Francisco

Posted on Blog by adrielhampton · May 13, 2010 12:50 AM · 1 reaction


In a webinar about Gov 2.0 on Tuesday, publisher and conference convener Tim O'Reilly referred to Carl Malamud as the father of the Gov 2.0 movement. Wednesday, Malamud was in San Francisco at the Mitchell Kapor Foundation offices for the 10th in a series of 15 workshops he's hosting around the country for his current project, Law.gov, which aims to create an authenticated bulk data feed for all primary legal materials in the U.S.
Malamud is not a lawyer, but he's met plenty - allies and adversaries - in his time as the nation's "rogue archivist." If you want open government, Malamud's your go-to guy. Intense and lightly sweating, at 9 a.m. he was decorating tables with postcards highlighting one of Law.gov's foundational elements, a state-by-state national inventory of legal materials; after the event, he broke down the space himself. Soon he'll be in Chicago and DC before returning home to the Bay Area and wrapping up a project report. He exudes a revolutionary zeal and the steady confidence of a veteran of many open government and privacy skirmishes.
Wednesday's series of panelists balanced open data dreams with hard truths about privacy in the globalized infoweb. Bob Berring, a UC Berkeley law professor, summed up the core issue: Carl is working on a 10 year old's question: Government has laws. We have to obey those laws. Where are they?
Twitter in-house counsel Alexander Macgillivray talked about the difficulty for legal staff's at small companies to afford basic research because of high Westlaw and Lexis fees - fees that units of government pay as well for access to legal documents.
Malamud believes that the law is one area that the disintermediating promise of the Internet has barely touched, and he brought in friend O'Reilly for a lunchtime discussion with California Secretary of State Debra Bowen.
"What are we missing as a society because we are denied access to what is essentially the open source of our democracy?" O'Reilly asked.
A recurring theme was the problem of authentication of legal materials online, and the implied authority of the two major vendors. Erika Wayne, a Stanford law librarian, asked if anyone had seen an "informational only" disclaimer - common on web legal materials - on a physical book.
Chris Hoofnagle, a privacy researcher and UC Berkeley law professor also had a stark warning about the need to protect individual privacy as advocates seek to put more government information online. He argued that believers in "Big Brother" powers for the government - "I'm serious" - will use the language of the transparency movement to accomplish their goal of a surveillance society.
Despite the serious mission and very real challenges, the promising theme of open data, Law 2.0 mashups and lowered barriers to legal knowledge was not lost. Said Macgillivray, imagine a statue with its own Twitter account, tweeting its revisions.


Also check out the #lawgov Twitter hashtag for continued workshop information. Malamud and the Law.gov project will be featured on the Gov 2.0 Radio podcast this fall.



Posted via email from Wired to Share


  • Sign in with Facebook
  • Sign in with Twitter
  • Sign in with Email


Take action Volunteer Support $
Follow @adrielhampton on Twitter

        

Disclaimer: Activities on this site may be used in demonstrations of NationBuilder's functionality.

Sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.
Created with NationBuilder