Structured Open Data Campaign - Sign On!

Update May 31, 2012:

This bill, SB 1002, passsed 34-0 out of the California Senate today! Here is the statement from Sen. Leland Yee, the bill's author.
"The Senate Appropriations committee today recognized the need for government agencies to deliver information to the public in an efficient, modern format," said Jim Ewert, General Counsel for the California Newspaper Publishers Association. "SB 1002 will set the benchmark for transparency and government oversight in the 21st century."

UPDATE Feb. 7, 2012:

Sen. Yee's office is working on SB 1002 and the language is still in draft. Open government and open data advocates are encouraged to comment, and I am helping organizing a meeting with the Senator for the week of Feb. 20 in San Francisco.

Here's the FAQ on SB 1002 (pdf)

And here's the draft bill text for SB 1002 (pdf)


Comments meant for official consideration should be directed to Alicia Lewis, 

_________________________________________

Open data in San Francisco, the state of California, and throughout much of the U.S. and the world remains hobbled by a lack of legal definition. San Francisco's own open data law, for example, is posted online by the Board of Supervisors as a non-searchable PDF. On December 10-11, at the winter CityCampSF Hackathon, Gov 2.0 advocates will publicly launch an advocacy campaign to institute an open data standard in San Francisco municipal and California state law. The primary goal of this advocacy will be to achieve a clear and reasonable definition of open data for all materials required by law to be published online.

Please join us in endorsing this advocacy campaign, and encourage your friends and legislators to sign on as well.

Use our recruiting tools to rally your friends to this important cause.

For more backgound on open data laws, check out Civic Commons - Data Policy Policy; and Open Standards Policy.

For another definition of open data online that we will consider, see the CityCamp model Open Government directive, which describes open data as being published online in an "open format that can be retrieved, downloaded, indexed, sorted, searched, and reused by commonly used Web search applications and commonly used software."

This legislation should also encompass the goals of increased transparency in responses to SF Sunshine Ordinance requests and California Public Records Act requests - documents released in an electronic format after implementation of this ordinance would have to follow its standards of accessibility.

Machine-readability: Data should be published in structured formats easily processed by machines/software.

119 endorsements
150 endorsements

Will you endorse?

or Text OPENDATA to to endorse
  • mentioned link to this page. 2011-11-16 20:08:29 -0500
    @ Done. 18 signatures for structured in SF and CA. Can we get to 50 by midnight?
    · ·
  • Jonas Heineman endorsed 2011-11-16 20:06:25 -0500
  • endorsed 2011-11-16 20:05:00 -0500
  • mentioned link to this page. 2011-11-16 20:04:33 -0500
    SF and California need a meaningful legal definition of . Join the campaign! via @
    · ·
  • Kaolin Fire endorsed 2011-11-16 20:04:04 -0500
  • peter radzio endorsed 2011-11-16 20:01:47 -0500
  • Lisa Mason endorsed 2011-11-16 19:55:24 -0500
  • Vision4Standards endorsed 2011-11-16 19:53:03 -0500
    I hope the definition of acceptable formats can be refined. There are proprietary formats that have become defacto standards. SF and CA need open public data standards. A metadata repository describing available data would give developers and government agencies more flexibility and data format delivery options at a much lower cost than what is produced by hackathons currently.
  • Anonymous endorsed 2011-11-16 19:50:16 -0500
  • endorsed 2011-11-16 19:48:22 -0500
  • Elisa Butler endorsed 2011-11-16 19:46:17 -0500
  • Anonymous endorsed 2011-11-16 19:44:12 -0500
  • Paul Steinbrueck endorsed 2011-11-16 19:43:58 -0500
    “San Francisco’s own open data law, for example, is posted online by the Board of Supervisors as a non-searchable PDF.” How ironic. :p
  • Dave Augustine endorsed 2011-11-16 19:40:42 -0500
    As a developer who works with open data and has co-created open government projects I must say this is a necessary step. Let’s lead the way!
  • Bonnie Sayers endorsed 2011-11-16 19:40:25 -0500
  • endorsed 2011-11-16 19:39:45 -0500
  • Russ Bastable posted about this on 2011-11-16 19:38:17 -0500
    SF and California need a meaningful legal definition of . Join the campaign!
  • tweeted link to this page. 2011-11-16 19:38:09 -0500
    18 signatures for structured in SF and CA. Can we get to 50 by midnight?
    · ·
  • larry myers endorsed 2011-11-16 19:37:52 -0500
  • Russ Bastable endorsed 2011-11-16 19:36:07 -0500
  • Janis La Couvée endorsed 2011-11-16 19:35:30 -0500
  • Steve Hall endorsed 2011-11-16 19:35:25 -0500
    Will follow this campaign with interest
  • mentioned link to this page. 2011-11-16 19:33:47 -0500
    SF and California need a meaningful legal definition of . Join the campaign! via @
    · ·
  • Gabriel Flores endorsed 2011-11-16 19:32:07 -0500
  • Nathalie Steinmetz endorsed 2011-11-16 19:31:55 -0500
  • John Madden endorsed 2011-11-16 19:31:48 -0500
  • mentioned link to this page. 2011-11-16 19:31:25 -0500
    SF and California need a meaningful legal definition of . Join the campaign! via @
    · ·
  • Charlie Perkins endorsed 2011-11-16 19:30:26 -0500
  • Funk Sanctum endorsed 2011-11-16 19:29:54 -0500
  • Tom Cooley posted about this on 2011-11-16 19:29:39 -0500
    SF and California need a meaningful legal definition of . Join the campaign!

Take action Volunteer Support $